In this installment of our new back-to-basics series, we take a laser focus on lens materials and the pros and cons of each.
When discussing lens materials, whether it be with a client or an individual with the lens lab, the conversation is primarily focused on expectations. How thin or thick will the lenses be? Will the consumer understand the correlation and see value in upgrading for a higher-end lens material?
While sometimes the decision of what lens material to use is outside of our control as eyecare professionals, due to factors such as a patient’s budget or Rx range limitations, it is our ethical duty to explain the options, educate the patient, and, if need be, state our unwillingness to make a pair of glasses with an index that will result in a negative visual experience and appearance.
Before We Begin…
Before weighing the pros and cons of lens materials, it must be said that frame fit on a patient and the resulting decentration based on pupillary distance and optical center height actually have a big influence on the thickness and weight of the lenses—and can have more influence than the lens material choice. Ensuring that a patient’s frame selection is a good fit and compatible with their Rx will result in the most aesthetically desirable and visually sound pair of glasses.
Lens Materials
It is impossible to discuss lens materials without a review of the fundamentals of Abbe value and what it means in relation to lens materials. While Abbe value isn’t a topic that comes up in the lens material selection process with patients, knowing the effect the Abbe value can have on a patient’s visual experience can help troubleshoot tolerance issues should they arise.
All ophthalmic plastic lens materials have an associated Abbe value (a number between 30 and 58), which values the measurement of the lens material’s dispersion of light. A lens with a low Abbe value causes a higher dispersion and leads to unwanted chromatic aberration. Chromatic aberration is a distortion of the image due to the inability of the lens to focus all colors onto the same focal point, which a patient may describe as a rainbow halo effect emitting from lights. The higher the number, the better the visual optical performance. CR-39 plastic and 1.5 glass lenses have the highest Abbe value, although other characteristics of these materials typically make them a less desirable choice in lens index.
THE LENS GUIDE.
Here, a primer on today’s key lens materials, from plastic and Trivex to glass.
1.5/CR-39 Plastic
This material is best suited for a low prescription range of plano to +/-3.00D in a full-frame mounting with protected edges.
Pros
- Highest Abbe value in plastic
- The least expensive option in lens materials
- Uniform density (color saturation) in tinting
- Widest range of premanufactured lens prescriptions
Cons
- Does not offer UV protection
- Can crack, chip, or break easily
1.6 Index Plastic
Best suited for patients with a prescription above +/-3.25D and below +/-5.00D and for larger frame sizes that will use more surface area of the lens blank. Will reduce center thickness in plus lenses, edge thickness in minus lenses, and the overall weight of the lenses.
Pros
- Thinner than CR-39 by up to 25%
- Stronger than CR-39
- More scratch resistant
Cons
- More expensive
- Has a lower Abbe value than CR-39 plastic
1.67 Index Plastic
Best suited for patients with a prescription +/-5.00D to +/-8.00D and for larger frame sizes that will use more surface area of the lens blank. A more costly lens index, but one that achieves a desirable thinness and weight.
Pros
- The material is up to 40% thinner than CR-39 plastic.
- Lighter feeling and more aesthetically pleasing
Cons
- More expensive
- Lower Abbe value than other high-index plastics
1.74 Index Plastic
Best suited for patients with high prescriptions over +/-8.00D or those with lower prescriptions who are seeking an oversized frame style or require additional lens decentration due to facial layout and frame fit limitations.
Pros
- The thinnest, lightest plastic lens material available from all lens vendors
- High Rx range availability
Cons
- Most expensive
- There are fewer lens style and feature options.
Polycarbonate
Best suited for those seeking light lenses with safety in mind. Impact and shatter resistance makes them ideal for children, safety glasses, and sports eyewear. UV protection is a quality of the lens material.
Pros
- Impact and shatter resistant
- Inexpensive thinner and lighter lens option than CR-39
Cons
- Scratches easily
- Lowest Abbe value
Trivex
Best suited for children’s glasses, safety glasses, and sports eyewear due to the impact-resistant qualities. Nylor, drilled rimless designs, and frame mountings that have exposed edges are also well suited for Trivex.
Pros
- UV protection
- Better Abbe value than poly
- Lightest lens material
Cons
- Not the thinnest
- Scratches more easily than high-index plastic
Glass
While not widely used anymore, glass lenses are still the lens material of choice for patients accustomed to the clarity of vision in high prescriptions or those seeking hard lenses that are difficult to scratch.
Pros
- Most scratch resistant
- Available in 1.8 and 1.9 indexes
- Has the best Abbe value of all optical lenses
Cons
- Can break or crack (chemical hardening is essential to reduce the risk)
- Heavier weight
- Limited availability (especially in progressive lens layouts)
HIGH-TECH TALK:
Lens Materials With Embedded Blue Light Protection
Available in a variety of lens indexes, lenses with blue light protection built within the lens material is a lens technology now offered by Zeiss, Essilor, and Shamir.
With blue light protection embedded into the lens material, ECPs can offer protection rivaling the UV and blue light protection achieved in sunwear while eliminating the undesirable blue-violet reflection of blue light AR lens coatings.
To what degree a lens index will affect the appearance of the finished pair of glasses can be difficult to articulate or display. Using tools such as lens thickness calculators can show a numerical example of anticipated lens thickness, based on Rx, PD, and frame size in different lens materials. Presenting the patient with the comparisons will help involve them in the lens index selection discussion and set a realistic expectation of the physical appearance of the completed glasses.